Search for: "Natural Molecular Testing Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 5:58 am
Isabella Strickland of Huntsville, Alabama and a cardiac center, Cardiology P.C. of Birmingham, Alabama, have agreed to pay a total of more than $1.1 million to resolve the allegations. * * * According to the settlement agreements, between 2012 and 2013 the doctors and cardiac center were alleged to have accepted payments from now-defunct testing company Natural Molecular Testing Corporation (NMTC) in return for ordering genetic tests from NMTC,… [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
A Franchisor would only count “corporate” employees, and the Franchisee would count employees of each individual franchise separately. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:29 am
The court is reviewing Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP) v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has been issuing patents on human genes for over 20 years, giving private corporations, individuals, and universities exclusive rights to those genes and to test, study, or even look at them. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Brief for the New York Intellectual Property Law Association Brief for Microsoft Corporation, EMC Corporation, and Intel Corporation Brief for Association Internationale Pour La Protection De La Propriété Intellectuelle et al. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:25 pm
Third, Alice Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
[I’d think corporation/defamation analogy would be a useful frame.] [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
Together we can bring an end to gene patenting to ensure the human genome, and all DNA found in nature, is open to everyone for the benefit of everyone — not just corporate profits. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:23 pm
Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 am
• The scientific consensus is that there is a lack of knowledge regarding how nanomaterials interact at the molecular or physiological levels and their potential impacts on health and the environment.Is FDA doing enough? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
June 21, 2011 VOTE NO ON H.R. 1249 SPECIAL INTEREST PATENT BILL BENEFITS FOREIGN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS OVER U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:57 pm
Biogen, and Association for Molecular Pathology.So what should the Federal Circuit do instead? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:18 am
” Medical diagnostic tests are not patentable if the claims cover a mere law of nature: In its March decision of Mayo v, Prometheus, the Court found that certain patent claims for a diagnostic test for treating autoimmune disease covered mere “laws of nature” that are not patent eligible. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:26 am
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:06 am
Supreme Court Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:42 pm
Alice Corporation Pty. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Microsoft Corporation, 627 F.3d 859 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
There are times we shouldn't be messing with Mother Nature. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
McNeely, in which the Court held that in drunk-driving investigations, the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream does not inevitably constitute an exigency sufficient to justify conducting a blood test without a warrant, similarly continues to attract attention. [read post]
