Search for: "New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 8:09 am
., New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc. and Lacoste USA Inc, in addition to a handful of logistics companies. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm
New Balance Athletics, Inc., 2019 WL 3413444 (S.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-01016, 2011 WL 1527716 (W.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., No. 1:11-cv-01016, 2011 WL 1527716 (W.D. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:36 pm
Bennett September 6, 2007 Cleat maker, Cleated Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Tanel 360 filed suit against the makers of Reebok, Adidas, Nike and New Balance athletic shoes for trademark infringement of Tanel’s registered trademark 360 in international class 25 for footwear. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:15 pm
In that case, the Federal Circuit upheld a district court’s grant of summary judgment of noninfringement to a number of defendants—including Asics, Nike, adidas America, Inc., New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., and Puma North America, Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:37 am
Peck granted summary judgment to defendant New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. against plaintiff defendant Denimafia Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:58 am
In November of 2018, Kawhi signed a new endorsement contract with New Balance, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc. accused Louis Vuitton of trademark infringement, alleging Louis Vuitton copied one of its popular shoe designs. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Defendant: Nike, Inc., Reebok International, LTD, adidas-Salomon North America, Inc., New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
Electronic Arts, Inc., --- F. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am
The text:A Shoe In! [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (Docket Report) District Court New Hampshire: 30% royalty is not excessive even though it eliminates profits on infringing sales: Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., 194 F.3d 252, 259 (1st Cir. 1999) (“Title VII does not proscribe harassment simply because of sexual orientation”); Simonton v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe, No. 11–1016 (W.D. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Options Exchange Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., 2011 WL 1527716, *3 (W.D. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., where Judge Selya was recognizing that the absence of a need to use the McDonnell Douglas framework to prove discriminatory intent in failure-to-accommodate claims (because the failure to accommodate was necessarily “because of a disability”) did not affect the adverse-employment-action requirement. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
"Pro-Samsung #2: Computer & Communications Industry AssociationI have a huge problem with the CCIA's positions on software copyright, but I will always credit the organization (of which Samsung is a member) for its pioneering role in placing the emphasis on how to interpret the term "article of manufacture" in an amicus brief filed with the Federal Circuit two years ago.The organization's new amicus brief is consistent with previous filings. [read post]
