Search for: "New Cingular Wireless Services Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2004, 6:49 am
In Tuesday's corporations and securities law news, Cingular Wireless beat out Britain's Vodafone Group Plc and won an auction for smaller rival AT&T Wireless Services Inc. with a $41 billion offer. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:57 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, written by Judge Reinhardt. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:54 am
"In this case, we consider whether a class arbitration waiver in New Cingular Wireless Service Inc.'s standard contract for cellular phone services is unconscionable under California law, and whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a holding that the waiver is unenforceable. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:26 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, 606 F.3d 658 (9th Cir. 2010), issued in May and amended in September, in which the Ninth Circuit addressed the UCL's "unlawful" prong: In his complaint, Shroyer alleged that New Cingular violated the common law of unfair competition and breached his contract. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:05 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., No. 06-55964 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
March 16, 2012), Plaintiffs are current and former customers of defendants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
United States Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, as if predicting the very contents of my April 21, 2010 Daily Journal article, ordered Defendants AT & T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LCC, and New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. to produce the contact information for thousands of customers that had complained after incurring international roaming charges without first issuing a privacy notice. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007) and affirmed a District Court decision that a class arbitration waiver was unconscionable and unenforceable in a class action ? [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 12:42 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 432 F.Supp.2d 788, 789 (N.D. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:23 pm
Cingular Wireless LLC, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1970858 (S.D.Fla. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
This showed that New Cingular conducts significant business in wireless communications using the trade name “New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC” and, therefore, that New Cingular uses CINGULAR as part of its trade name, and that the trade name is known to the relevant public. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:08 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, Slip Opn., at 9993 et seq. (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
AT&T, Plaintiffs are current and former customers of defendants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:11 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 4:49 am
New Cingular Wireless Servs., Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007) (California law); Tillman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:07 am
New Cingular Wireless Servs., Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007), discussing a similar class action waiver under California law, id. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. (9th Cir. 2007) 498 F.3d 976, 983; In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation (N.D.Cal. 2008) 596 F.Supp.2d 1288, 1298; Stiener v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:09 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
