Search for: "Non-Individual Defendants-Class II-d"
Results 1 - 20
of 296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:13 am
.), a putative class action removed to federal court by a co-defendant pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
The plaintiffs now seek to certify their class of Illinois consumers who were subjected to the same deceptive and misleading language.ANALYSISSpecifically, the plaintiffs wish to certify the following class:(a) all individuals in Illinois, (b) against whom WPR filed a complaint, (c) containing the language in paragraph 12 of Appendices A-D [in the Second Amended Complaint], (d) which complaint was filed on or after February 3, 2013 and prior to February… [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
§ 1332(d)(11)(B)(ii)(III).Id. at *30. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Robinson Worldwide, Inc., 2005 WL 758602, at *16 (D. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm
Non-identical parts could be considered tuning. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
The questions as to punitive damages may include: a) whether they can be awarded; b) if so, whether as a lump sum, as a multiplier of individual compensatory damages, or on a per class member basis, c) whether they can be tried before individual liability as to specific class members, or as to absent class members, or non-bellwether plaintiffs has been decided; d) whether they can be awarded before the actual amount of compensatory… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:56 am
For the second straight quarter, even as the number of new credit crisis security class actions virtually disappeared we did not see a corresponding increase in the number of non-credit crisis class actions. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:51 am
LEXIS 138702 (D. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
In Phase II-B, the jury was asked to decide the amount of punitive damages the defendants should pay to the class as a whole. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
In Phase II-B, the jury was asked to decide the amount of punitive damages the defendants should pay to the class as a whole. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:39 pm
Indeed, our review of these non-class action filings indicates that approximately 210 M&A transactions were hit with the filing of individual complaints. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:54 pm
If the EEOC carries this burden, the employer can attempt to defend itself by challenging the EEOC’s proof or providing non-discriminatory explanations for its procedures. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
committed the (class C felony) (class D felony) (class A misdemeanor) of making a terroristic threat, punishable upon conviction under [ Insert appropriate punishment provision. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:44 pm
Certification under the Class Proceedings Act requires that a number of requirements described at section 5(1) of the Act be present: 5(1) The court shall certify a class proceeding on a motion under section 2, 3 or 4 if,(a) the pleadings or the notice of application discloses a cause of action;(b) there is an identifiable class of two or more persons that would be represented by the representative plaintiff or… [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:02 am
As a resource for class action defense attorneys who defend against RESPA (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) class actions, we provide the text of Regulation X.Congress gave authority to the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to promulgate regulations for RESPA, and the regulations are set forth in 24 CFR § 3500.1 et seq.The regulations concerning escrow accounts are set forth in § 3500.17, which … [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:18 pm
Bartlett; (d) Ms. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
This action is one of eleven lawsuits brought by individuals who claim that they developed Non–Hodgkins lymphoma as a result of exposure to PCBs. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:14 am
(ii) Costs of Arbitration. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
However, plaintiffs alleged that defendants made their misrepresentations to all members of the class, with examples including on defendants’ websites and in Apple stores. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
All this was just fine with the original Ninth Circuit panel:Relying on [Campbell], [defendant] argues that a punitive damages award in the absence of individualized hearings would violate its due process rights because it might punish legal conduct and award damages to non-victims. [read post]
