Search for: "Oak Park Homeowners Association" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2013, 2:24 pm by Lori Schweller
In both cases, the Virginia Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s ruling for the homeowners who argued that their rights under the declaration had been violated by the association – that the association breached the contract between the association and the homeowner plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm by Lori Schweller
In both cases, the Virginia Supreme Court upheld the trial court’s ruling for the homeowners who argued that their rights under the declaration had been violated by the association – that the association breached the contract between the association and the homeowner plaintiffs. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:38 pm
[NOTE: In the 1986 case of Pacifica Homeowners Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Most homeowners in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Hudson Oaks, Willow Park, Azle, Peaster, Brock, Millsap, Cool, and other communities in Parker County would not be very interested in the legal technicalities associated with an insurance dispute. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:52 am by Mark S. Humphreys
People in Weatherford, Aledo, Azle, Willow Park, Hudson Oaks, Springtown, Millsap, Brock, Mineral Wells, and other places in Parker County need to know when it is time to get an experienced Insurance Law Attorney. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
*New Case Law The issue of short-term rentals (or “vacation rentals”) is becoming increasingly significant for homeowners associations (“HOAs”). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:12 am
Gary has served as chair of a bar association's Civil Litigation and Tort Section; and he has also served as a temporary judge in West Los Angeles, Van Nuys and the Chatsworth Courts and as a volunteer for many local groups, including schools, youth sport teams, the Boy Scouts of America and homeowner associations. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:14 am by Biersdorf & Associates
  You might remember how public outcry coupled with the support of the Castle Coalition persuaded the city of Oak Creek, WI to stop their pursuit of 94 year old Earl Geifer’s property; and how about the recent victory for property owners in Greenfield, WI? [read post]
The Court of Appeal considered whether privately owned drainage on private property allows for homeowner remedies by inverse condemnation if the water in the private pipeline is for public use. [read post]
The Court of Appeal considered whether privately owned drainage on private property allows for homeowner remedies by inverse condemnation if the water in the private pipeline is for public use. [read post]
The Court of Appeal considered whether privately owned drainage on private property allows for homeowner remedies by inverse condemnation if the water in the private pipeline is for public use. [read post]
The Court of Appeal considered whether privately owned drainage on private property allows for homeowner remedies by inverse condemnation if the water in the private pipeline is for public use. [read post]
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]
The trial court ruled against the lead agency and developer (Gelfand) based upon CEQA claims and violation of the City’s oak tree ordinance. [read post]