Search for: "Oakley, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 5:34 am
In a counterclaim filed May 17, 2010, Oakley, Inc., a sport sunglasses manufacturer, is accused of marking its products with hundreds of patents that were either:(i) expired,(ii) did not cover the marked products (e.g. patents on shoes and watches),(iii) were not owned by Oakley, or(iv) were non-existent.The counterclaim was filed by Suntech Optics, Inc. in response to accusations of infringement of patents D580963, 5387949, and 5638145.Oakley,… [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 10:38 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – The Plaintiff, Oakley, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:12 am
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Oakley, Inc. of Foothill Ranch, California, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, Swami Property Sunman Inc., d/b/a Sunman BP of Sunman, Indiana, Chirag Patel, an individual, and Does 1-10 (collectively “Defendants”) infringed its rights in United States Trademarks as seen below: Plaintiff is seeking judgment against Defendants, preliminary and permanent injunctions,… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:18 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Oakley, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 13, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) held that, if the plaintiffs claim that their lawsuit was the catalyst to action by the defendant, the pre-lawsuit notification requirement applies not only when fees are sought under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, as held in Graham v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:12 am
The case is titled Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:12 pm
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 7:26 am
Amazon.com, Inc. et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:31 pm
Avni Petroleum, Inc. et al. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:35 am
Oakley, Inc., is the owner of Trademark Registration Nos. 1,521,599, 1,984,501, 1,990,262, 3,331,124, and 3,365,728. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:39 am
Oakley Home Builders, Inc., 2014 WL 340035, No. 13 C 6019 (N.D. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:05 am
"Of course, Oakley, Inc. may still seek cancellation of the resulting registration, should one issue; so all is not hopeless.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:59 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:07 am
” HOLBROOK is, of course, a trademark of Oakley, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:30 am
The jury ruled for Plaintiffs Luxottica Group, LLC and Oakley, Inc., holding that Defendants Airport Mini Mall, LLC (AMM); Yes Assets, LLC; Chienjung (Jerome) Yeh; Donald Yeh; Jenny Yeh; and Alice Jamison were liable for contributory trademark infringement under the Lanham Act... [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
August 2019), Oakley, Inc. and its parent Luxottica sued the owners of a shopping mall in Georgia for contributory trademark infringement under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:30 am
The jury ruled for Plaintiffs Luxottica Group, LLC and Oakley, Inc., holding that Defendants Airport Mini Mall, LLC (AMM); Yes Assets, LLC; Chienjung (Jerome) Yeh; Donald Yeh; Jenny Yeh; and Alice Jamison were liable for contributory trademark infringement under the Lanham Act for allowing their subtenants to sell counterfeit goods that infringed the plaintiffs' trademarks. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:40 am
Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Moje sued Oakley Inc., which made the visor that Moje blamed for offering inadequate protection to his face and eyes. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:50 am
Plaintiff: Oakley, Inc. [read post]
