Search for: "Oregon v. Sierra" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 5:02 am by B.W. Barnett
Oregon, 548 U.S. 331, 362 (2006) (Ginsburg, J., concurring in judgment) (citing Case Concerning Avena and other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:21 am
Oregon Natural Resources Council, 490 U.S. 360 (1989); Alaska Center for the Environment v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
In other words, it could be that both Tahoe-Sierra AND Measure 37 in Oregon are both correctly decided. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 12:00 pm
As David Bookbinder, a Sierra Club lawyer, noted, "How often do federal authorities insist they lack the authority to do something? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by Steve Davies
District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong said the “Ninth Circuit’s holding in [Sierra Club v.] [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The six new states the measure creates are: the State of Jefferson (consisting roughly of the rural counties north of the Sacramento area all the way to the Oregon border); the State of Northern California (consisting roughly of an area from Marin and Sonoma Counties on the Pacific Coast, extending eastward through the Napa and Sacramento regions, and to the northern Sierra mountains all the way to Nevada); the State of Central California (consisting primarily of the… [read post]