Search for: "PARTY X v. PARTY Y"
Results 1 - 20
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2019, 12:52 pm
On appeal, the losing party totally abandons Argument X and instead relies on a totally different Argument Y. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:22 pm
X contracts with Y but before completing the contract Y starts doing business with Z. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
Suppose party ‘A’ supplies a product ‘X’ to party ‘B’, who uses ‘X’ in a process ‘Y’ to make product ‘Z’… OK, so maybe it is not entirely straightforward, considering all of the parties, products and processes potentially involved, but bear with us for just another couple of paragraphs. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:14 am
Thus, if the shareholder-petitioner seeking judicial dissolution of a corporation is a citizen of State X, the corporation is a citizen of State Y, and a named respondent shareholder is a citizen of State Z (or any state other than X), there is complete diversity of citizenship and the federal court has subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
Unless Party X assigned the patent to Party Y. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
I have now got hold of the judgment in X v Hounslow [2008] All ER 337 (May) (thanks to assorted helpful sprites). [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm
Memories about precisely what day it was when you did Y may indeed fade over time.But there's another reason to credit early-filed declarations as well.Sometimes, you only realize that a filing was due on Day X after the court, or your opposing party, files papers that say that your petition should be dismissed because it wasn't received until Day Y. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:12 am
X v LB Hounslow [2009] EWCA Civ 286. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Y. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Att’y Gen ., 424 F.3d 320, 330 (3d Cir. 2005) (quoting Bagot v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm
X owes Y some money; here, $85,000 on an unpaid promissory note. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
Governers of X School v R(on the Application of G) (Claimant) & Y City Council and Secretary of State for Children and Schools and Families (Interveners) & Equality and Human Rights Commission (Interested Party) [2010] EWCA Civ 1;CA (Civ Div) (Laws LJ, Wilson LJ, Goldring J) January 20 2010 Where an individual had a civil right being determined in one set of proceedings for the purposes of Article 6, he would be able to claim protection under that… [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
Further, the facts are such that a default by one party X is occasioned only by the default of the other Y (say, where X has to transfer possession of land to Y; Y has to construct a building on that land - X refuses to hand over possession). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
Company Y agrees to buy X for $80 million and promises that X’s shareholders will be made whole. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:49 pm
Why does X's lawsuit go forward but Y's lawsuit is dismissed? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
Question: you have a dispute over a sum of money with "X" and "Y". [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Now there are three parties here we can think about. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
It has no power to order X to give money to Y. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:45 am
It has no power to order X to give money to Y. [read post]
