Search for: "PROSPECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:53 pm
On January 8, 2009, the Supreme Court of California issued a unanimous decision in Prospect Medical Group Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:35 pm
On appeal, defendant argued that the Court should follow the holding in Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:36 pm
In a much anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court held, in Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Syntex Laboratories, Inc., 148 Ill. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:48 pm
Last week, a federal court rejected Securities America's attempt to force arbitration claimants to abandon their cases and require them to participate in a class action settlement that would allow defrauded investors to recover only one-eighth (1/8) of their $400 miilion in losses due to investments in Medical Capital Holdings, Inc. and Provident Royalties. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
In Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
Progress Energy, Inc. , No. 04-1525 (4th Cir. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:25 am
Brands, Inc., 16 P.3d 435, 441 (Nev. 2001) (en banc) (“[W]e hold that Nevada common law does not recognize a cause of action for medical monitoring”); Wood v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
She went to Erie Family Health Center Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
She went to Erie Family Health Center Inc. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:43 am
In DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Pfizer Inc., 446 F. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 7:33 am
Safeway Stores, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:58 pm
Cenac Towing Inc., 544 F. 3d 296 (5th Cir. 2008). [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:11 am
Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc. was between California's Compassionate Use Act, (which gives a person who uses marijuana for medical purposes on a physician’s recommendation a defense to certain state criminal charges and permission to possess the drug) and Federal law (which prohibits the drug’s possession, even by medical users). [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:51 pm
Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc., addressed the conflict between California's Compassionate Use Act, (which gives a person who uses marijuana for medical purposes on a physician’s recommendation a defense to certain state criminal charges and permission to possess the drug) and Federal law (which prohibits the drug’s possession, even by medical users). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:01 am
In Adams & Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Burlington Northern Railroad Holdings Inc., et al., Case No. 16-35205 (9th Cir. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:58 am
” In making this decision, OHA reaffirmed the holding of EFT Architects, Inc., which we examined on the blog in 2013. [read post]
