Search for: "Panasonic Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2009, 9:49 am
Panasonic Corporation had prior registrations for PANASONIC in classes 9, 7 and 11 for, inter alia, household electronic goods.The opposition and invalidation succeeded. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
On April 1, 2010, Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. of Japan (“Panasonic”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
The foundation of Panasonic’s electronics development has allowed the corporation and its subsidiaries to explore a great many applications for their electronics, some of them designed to address some serious health issues. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We’ve explored many areas of Panasonic’s recent R&D operations, and it’s no surprise that many of these innovations relate to the corporation’s long line of electronic products. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We’ve explored many areas of Panasonic’s recent R&D operations, and it’s no surprise that many of these innovations relate to the corporation’s long line of electronic products. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
The foundation of Panasonic’s electronics development has allowed the corporation and its subsidiaries to explore a great many applications for their electronics, some of them designed to address some serious health issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 5:34 pm
Lufthansa's Head Offices in Deut z-Cologne Author Duhon Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Deed Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King and Lords Justices Newey and Birss) Lufthansa Technik AG v Panasonic Avionics Corporation and others [2023] EWCA Civ 1273 (1 Nov 2023)Proceedings in the Chancery Division take place in two stages. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 2:49 am
Record file photo * Panasonic alleges unfairness in female executives' lawsuitAn Essex County judge refused to bow to accusations by Panasonic Corporation of North America on Friday that she had showed bias in the lawsuit filed by three female African-American executives who accuse the company of discrimination.Judge Christine Farrington, sitting in Newark, rejected a motion by Panasonic to remove herself from the case, after attorneys for the… [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:00 am
We also noticed a couple of patents again related to various lighting technologies developed by this corporation. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:22 pm
According to the SEC, “Panasonic’s U.S. subsidiary, Panasonic Avionics Corp. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:05 pm
Both orders addressed motions filed by Respondents Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Semiconductor Discrete Devices Co., Ltd. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:32 am
Pender issued Order No. 22 granting Respondents General Imaging Company, JVC Kenwood Corporation and JVC Americas Corporation, Olympus Corporation and the Olympus Corporation of the Americas, Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. and SANYO North America Corporation, VOXX International… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
Shamita Etienne-Cummings and the law firm of White & Case LLP (“W&C”) from representing Complainant Panasonic Corporation, Ltd. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:51 am
The top ten list is completed by other consumer product mega-corporations including Apple, LG, Procter & Gamble, Panasonic, Research in Motion (RIM), and 3M. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Panasonic Corporation v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:05 am
Panasonic Corporation, declining to take up the case on appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
On Nov. 15, 2010, Panasonic Corporation pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine, and on Dec.16, 2010, Embraco North America Inc. pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:47 am
On Nov. 15, 2010, Panasonic Corporation pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $49.1 million criminal fine, and on Dec.16, 2010, Embraco North America Inc. pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a $91.8 million criminal fine. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:46 am
” The report targets the 12 highest-level corporate benefactors of the Beijing Games, known as the TOP sponsors (”The Olympic Partner”): Atos Origin, Coca-Cola, General Electric (GE), Manulife (parent company of John Hancock), Johnson & Johnson, Kodak, Lenovo, McDonald's, Omega (Swatch Group), Panasonic (Matsushita), Samsung, and Visa. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:05 am
Panasonic Corporation, declining to take up the case on appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
