Search for: "Parker v. Jacobs"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:16 am
January 30, 2008) (Jacobs, Parker, Wesley, CJJ) (per curiam)Here, the court holds that a failure to make a claim under the Speedy Trial Act in the district court results in a waiver of the issue on appeal. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
December 14, 2010) (Jacobs, Pooler, Parker, CJJ)In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:35 am
Nov. 30, 2006) (Jacobs, Parker, Oberdorfer) (per curiam): This short opinion holds that convictions under (1) the second clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:57 am
Johnstone sued the Mayor and the Village for a racially hostile work environment.The district court says Johnstone cannot win the case, and the Court of Appeals (Parker, Jacobs and Walker) agrees. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:50 am
He sues the police, but he loses the case.The case is MacLeod v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am
We call this the Central Hudson doctrine.The Second Circuit (Parker, Restani [sitting by designation] and Jacobs [who dissents]) starts off by holding the law does in fact regulate speech-related conduct, as day-laborers looking for work are soliciting employment; that expresses a message. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
But the district court granted the employer's motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals (Parker, Jacobs and Restani [D.J.]) affirms. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:35 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:56 am
"Judge Parker dissents. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:13 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Kearse and Parker) says that Kovacs can invoke Couto. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:29 am
The plaintiff moved to disqualify the firm, and the motion was granted.Student note: The discussions between the plaintiff and the firm, which purportedly included matters at issue in the instant action, create the danger that confidences were disclosed, thus warranting the disqualification of the firm.Case: Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:10 pm
Slides: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxbYd30UHZqHNGU2R2ZMWkppTmc/view Video: http://livestream.com/internetsociety/hopeconf/videos/130727866 Ask the EFF: The Year in Digital Civil Liberties Kurt Opsahl, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews, Vivian Brown, Parker Higgins Privacy info. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:20 pm
Nev. 2006); accord Parker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The Court of Appeals (Kearse, Jacobs and Parker) disagrees and reinstates the case for a new trial.The district court said there was no evidence that the son's disability was the reason why the parents were denied the right to live there. [read post]