Search for: "ParkerVision, Inc."
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2018, 9:54 pm
Patent No. 6,091,940, owned by ParkerVision. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:41 am
San Diego - Qualcomm is scheduled to appear at a Markman hearing as a defendant in a patent infringement lawsuit brought against it by ParkerVision, Inc., a manufacturer and marketer of semiconductor technology solutions for wireless applications. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:09 am
Plaintiff Parkervision, Inc. filed a patent infringement action against Qualcomm. [read post]
Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Claim Construction Conflicting with Parallel District Court Proceedings
18 Dec 2023, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Claim Construction Conflicting with Parallel District Court Proceedings
18 Dec 2023, 8:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 5:42 pm
(“ParkerVision”) appeals fromthree final written decisions of the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm
ParkerVision, Inc., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:13 am
" ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:10 am
.'" ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
; ParkerVision v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Lee, No. 15-652 (Patent Term Adjustment – whether the 180 day deadline applies; could bleed into admin law issues) Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
ION Geophysical Corporation, No. 15-1085 (consequential lost-profit damages for infringement under Section 271(f)) Jury Role: Parkervision, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
MacroSolve, Inc., No. 15-1369 (district court’s too-high burden) Globus Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
