Search for: "Pats Construction, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 3:36 pm by Samantha G. Wilson
Patent No. 6,263,222, Judge Thynge had previously recommended adoption of defendants’ claim construction of a key term, and although Judge Stark “ultimately disagreed with the construction,” id., it was clear from these facts that defendants’ reliance on their construction to show noninfringement was reasonable. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
The seminar rounded off with Richard Davis covering the recent Meter-Tech LLC v British Gas Trading Limited [2016] EWHC 2278 (Pat) decision. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
As a brief refresher, in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) Arnold J construed the Swiss form claim as requiring the infringer (for example a generic producer) to “subjectively intend” the medicine to be used for the patented indication. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
 In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
  It is clear that the prohibition on added matter in s 76(3)(a) 1977 Act relates to an amendment which results in the disclosure of matter additional to that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed rather than the specification of the patent being amended (Triumph Actuation Systems LLC v Aeroquip-Vickers Ltd [2007] EWHC 1367 (Pat) [36]-[41] (reported on by this blog here) a Pumfrey J decision which he referred to and endorsed in Monsanto Technology LLC v… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:00 am by Emma Irwin (Bristows)
The neutral citation for the case is [2020] EWHC 2636 (Pat) and a link to the judgment is found here. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am by Martin Miller
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has once again reaffirmed that appellate review of patent claim interpretations is de novo, without deference to the trial court even for factual matters.1 The 6-4 en banc decision in Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 2:52 am by SHG
His family, friends and supporters thought the system singled him out for abuse, and constructed a narrative as to why. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm by Joe Mullin
(Read Judge Davis' order finalizing the claim construction [PDF].) [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:43 am by Eric Hoke, Paralegal
Pat Quinn has signed bills creating a council to study the potential for wind energy projects in Lake Michigan and allowing counties to establish wind farm districts. [read post]