Search for: "Paul V. Maier"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2012, 3:53 am
SHELDA ELISABETH MAIER, App. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
Said Paul, four levels of decisions is far too many (that's examiner or cancellation board, Board of Appeal, General Court, CJEU). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(Patently-O) (Inventive Step) Commissioner Kappos on improving patent reexaminations (Article One Partners) (Maier & Maier) Innovation is sprouting in US Patent Office: A plea for flexibility from patent practitioners and interested parties to allow the necessary changes (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) US Patents Dr Seuss and the USPTO Application Exchange Programme (IPKat) Anticipation building: The long wait for Bilski (Maier & Maier) (271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
Rubin and Maier A. [read post]
7 May 2011, 1:37 am
– counterfeit souvenirs relating to Pope John Paul II / ????????????????????? [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:15 am
* News.com: A Missouri prosecution under Missouri's new Megan Maier anti-cyberbullying aw. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
QS Holdings Sarl v Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) (ipwars) Canada ACCC’s request for reconsideration of Board’s ruling re opt-outs denied (Excess Copyright) FCA upholds patent infringement and validity: Phostech v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am
Mbatha v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
– demise of ‘News of the World’ (IPKat) Summer surprise – British MPs to debate IP today (IPKat) UK IPO litigation manual refreshed (PatLit) Signalling, heuristics and accountability: British Brands Group’s annual lecture (IPKat) United States US General ITC issues proposed rules and procedures for electronic filing (ITC 337 Law Blog) US Patent Reform Guest post by the Hon Paul Michel: Rein in the big bank bail-out – H.R. 1249 Section 18… [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
As is often the way, the AmeriKat unfortunately missed the first part of the session where John Richards of (Ladas & Parry) introduced the panel and Paul Maier (Director, EU Observatory on Infringements of IP Rights, EUIPO) spoke on the impending European Trade Secrets Directive. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
MAIER v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
" Eric Schweibenz, a partner at Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustad, shared Sobin's assessment. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Braun Melsungen AG, et. al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
IPOff Ltd (PatLit) UK investment in IP-protected assets reached £65bn by 2008, research finds (Out-Law.com) United States US Patent Reform USPTO prepares for Patent Reform (Patents Post Grant Blog) Patent reform awaits Senate compromise on debt ceiling (Patents Post Grant Blog) America Invents Act: Qui tam provision and virtual patent marking (Maier & Maier) Interview with Chief Judge Paul R. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(Inventive Step) US Patents USPTO looks to streamline appeals by amending BPAI Rules (271 Patent Blog) (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Director’s Forum) (IP Spotlight) USPTO announces extension and expansion of Green Technology Pilot Program (Green Patent Blog) The enhanced examination timing control initiative part 2 & 3: Advantages and disadvantages; implications for foreign (Maier & Maier) (Maier & Maier) How effective… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
& Anor v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
Kappos | Supreme Court | 35 USC 101 | Business Methods"; Timothy J Maier: "Bilski v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm
Spain), homophobic jokes (Sousa Goucha v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Crosstown Music Company 1, LLC v Rive Droite Music Limited, Mark Taylor and Paul Barry (jiplp) Doh! [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Paul Maier (President of the Boards of Appeals, OHIM), with whom Professor David Llewelyn (Kings/Singapore) agreed, said that the current state of European case law represented the high point of recognition of protection of reputation of trade marks in Europe -- but, David said, it is important to understand how these ruling, arguably justified in themselves, are used by lawyers in seeking unjustifiably to press for wider protection than that countenanced by the courts. [read post]
