Search for: "People v Rosario" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2011, 8:56 am
this is known as the Rosario Rule pursuant to People v Rosario, 9 NY 2d 286 and CPL 240.44, 240.45. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:02 pm
Since Peo-Wit is presently testifying for the People upon this trial the defendant urges that the rule established by the Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the prejudice… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant informed the People and the officer of his intention to reopen the hearing upon receipt of the missing Rosario material. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:02 am by SHG
  Instead, it holds tight to People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 12:32 pm
The Court of Appeals was confronted with this issue today in People v Antwine, 2007 NY Slip Op 05585. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Sweeney, Non-retroactivity, Candour and ‘Transitional Relativism’: A Response to the ECtHR Judgment in Maktouf and Damjanovi v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Venkat
AmayaCrass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension -- Rosario v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court actually resolved this issue in Rosario v. [read post]