Search for: "People v. McCann" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Even since McCann v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gehrl weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:15 am by Matrix Law
The injunction which was granted against Mr Jones included provisions preventing him from entering a large area in central Birmingham, associating with or contacting ten people named in the injunction, and participating in music videos containing material which might relate to gangs operating in Birmingham. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 16 March 2010 and is the second part of a post in which Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann discuss the law and practice of harassment as applied to the media. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm by NL
Of interest to housing lawyers are the JCHR findings and the Government response on McCann and Kay v UK, Connors and implementation of s.318 Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, and Schedule 15 Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 in relation to the incompatibility in Morris v Westminster CC [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm by NL
Of interest to housing lawyers are the JCHR findings and the Government response on McCann and Kay v UK, Connors and implementation of s.318 Housing and Regeneration Act 2008, and Schedule 15 Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 in relation to the incompatibility in Morris v Westminster CC [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:50 am by John Day
 In Eric's opinion, that means that trial judges are going to require that there is a "factual predicate" to make the demand,  a showing required by in an opinion by a New York appellate court in McCann v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:52 am by Eric Goldman
Altajir * Facebook Evidence Suppressed in Skater Brawl Prosecution–People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 6:59 am by Bexis
"That's the lesson of this new New York appellate case, McCann v. [read post]