Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Dred Scott, The Civil Rights Cases, Lochner, Reynolds v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
It also puts into context the superiority of the French approach regarding abortion, which is proven with the reversal of Roe. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
People often think that “marriage” and “family” are synonymous, but these words are not interchangeable in law. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
He remained in the position until being elected a Pima County Superior Court Judge. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Burke, 240 So.2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
We all should wonder why it happened without much opposition from this diverse United States.The 1970s and 1980s Are the Seedbed for the Current Supreme Court’s Conservative MakeupIn 1971, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower court decision in Coit v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Pacific Palisades Residents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:53 am
The Superior Court panel found the trial court opinion so compelling that they affirmed and published the lower court opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13] As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:31 pm
My own view is that courts can best empower ordinary people by helping to enable them to "vote with their feet," which is in many respects superior to both ballot-box voting and concentrating power in the hands of experts. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
