Search for: "People v. Superior Court (1970)" Results 81 - 100 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2014, 3:56 pm
Similarly, some well-meaning people opposed interracial marriage without believing that one race is inherently superior to another (e.g. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
  This case also has serious statute of limitations problems, and it seems unlikely that a court considering class certification really could conclude that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) could be satisfied in a case where the sexual ab [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If courts take conceptual separability seriously, it becomes the German test in disguise—but even the German court has now abandoned a test of superior creativity, so there’s only one test of originality in German law, which doesn’t require superior creativity. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Supreme Court ruled in a series of cases in the 1970s and 1980s that unwed fathers had constitutionally protected parental rights, which could not be categorically disregarded by state parentage and custody laws. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The court explored a tricky concept here – there was nothing that was completely on point – relying on Niederlehner v. [read post]