Search for: "Phoenix Beverages, Inc."
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
Pepper Hilton Hotels Black & Decker Dunlop Tires IBM Braum’s Inc. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:35 pm
Vital Pharmaceutical, Inc. 2010 WL 1734960 (S.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:04 am
The USPTO recently allowed a trademark filing by Luxembourg Capital for 212 BEER — which may signal an intent to use the mark for a New York City beverage. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 10:04 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:19 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
DorfLast week's oral argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:28 am
Subsequently, in accordance to filing a demand for settlement, the plaintiff then filed the aid instant lawsuit which seeks to recover underinsured motorist benefits that is under the SUM certification of the said policy which was issued by Hartford Co. to the employer of the complainant, Windmill Distributing Company, LP, which is doing business under the name of Phoenix Beverages, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 6:45 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
Energy Beverages LLC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:02 pm
Phoenix of Hartford Ins. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:00 pm
In Sunset Park, just as the strong commitment to brownfields cleanup and the opening of the waterfront to residents with a new park constitute great leaps forward, we also applaud the announcement that Phoenix, Sims and Axis will become full fledged members of the Brooklyn Waterfront community. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
[FN3: Alcoholic beverages may be consumed, but at the personal expense of the consumer.] [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
Pollack issued his decision July 1, 2008. *** Airo Die Casting, Inc., A Subsidiary of Leggett & Platt, Inc. (6-CA-34937, et al.; 354 NLRB No. 8) Loyalhanna, PA, April 29, 2009. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
