Search for: "Premier Dealer Services, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., you may not realize that I sat in on that case as the fourth justice. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Premier Dealer Services, 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327 (June 24, 2013). [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:49 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court recently held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:01 pm
They used a Staten Island-based company, Premier Links, Inc., as an unregistered broker dealer from 2006-2012. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 11:52 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., which held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
Premier Dealer Services Inc., 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327 that, absent other consideration, two years of employment are required for a restrictive covenant to be supported by adequate consideration, regardless of whether the covenant was signed at the outset of employment or after, and regardless of whether the employee quit or was fired. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:45 pm
Premier Dealer Services Inc., 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327 that, absent other consideration, two years of employment are required for a restrictive covenant to be supported by adequate consideration, regardless of whether the covenant was signed at the outset of employment or after, and regardless of whether the employee quit or was fired. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 373 Ill. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:52 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., which held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327 has caused much head-scratching, and the Illinois legislature essentially punted on the issue in the recent amendments to the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, 820 ILCS 90/1, et seq. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:14 pm
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. involves an insurance salesman marketing finance and insurance products to the automotive industry. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:07 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court recently held that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration – even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer – and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. that an employer needed to provide consideration beyond mere employment itself to validate a non-compete, most business (read: management-side) attorneys thought this decision was a misread that was inevitably headed for reversal.Not so.The Supreme Court of Illinois has denied the Petition for Leave to Appeal that Premier Dealer Services filed after Fifield prevailed on his consideration argument. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327, that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration—even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2013 IL App (1st) 120327, that, absent other consideration, two years of employment is required for a restrictive covenant to be deemed supported by adequate consideration—even where the employee signed the restrictive covenant as a condition to his employment offer and even where the employee voluntarily resigned. [read post]
