Search for: "Price v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 5:37 am
The Social Security Administration has announced that there will be no Cost of Living Adjustment for Social Security and SSI benefits in 2011. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:18 am
v=Vgm5q4YT1AM. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:14 am
The Social Security Administration has announced that there will be a 1.7% cost of living adjustment (COLA) for Social Security and SSI beneficiaries in calendar year 2013. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:02 am
The Social Security Administration has announced that there will be a 3.6% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for Social Security and SSI beneficiaries in 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:43 am
Regina (FDA and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and another: [2012] EWCA Civ 332; [2012] WLR (D) 95 “The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was entitled to use the Consumer Price Index, rather than the Retail Price Index, as the measure of consumer price inflation for the purpose of annually uprating public service pensions under section 150 of the Social Security Administration… [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
The new Social Security Trustees Report has just been released. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
But at what price? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
” The report focuses on six particular pathways giving rise to these challenges: Threats to the stability of countries; Heightened social and political tensions; Adverse effects on food prices and availability; Increased risks to human health; Negative impacts on investments and economic competitiveness; and Potential climate discontinuities and secondary surprises. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
”[17] The court disagreed, stating: “The efficient price is not set by an invisible hand that instantly reflects new information in a security’s price, but through the dynamic, high-volume exchange of a security over an appropriate window of time. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In the late 1930s, when federal courts appeared reluctant to vindicate equal protection claims, the federal Social Security Board (later to become part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) took a more active role via its administration of federal grants for state-run public welfare programs. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Extreme Vetting -- As co-bloggers Michael Price and Faiza Patel have noted, the likely way that "extreme vetting" will come to be is through a reboot of the National Security Entry-Exit Registration program known as NSEERs. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:27 am
Bower More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
They'll agree to huge cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and other parts of the social safety net if that's what it takes to avoid a default. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm
So any notion that my administration has shut down oil production might make for a good political sound bite, but it doesn't match up with reality. . . [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 9:58 pm
In a letter dated December 4, 2006, from acting Administrator Leslie V. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:23 pm
…The Social Security Administration was set up to administer benefits, not to enforce immigration laws. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Retirement System member retroactively reinstated to Tier I membership not entitled to employee contributions he or she made to the Retirement System as a Tier III member Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 2013 NY Slip Op 04405, Appellate Division, Third Department An individual [Member] was employed in various positions by New York State public employers in 1968 until 1975 when he left public service. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has also heard, or will hear, administrative law cases that will impact different aspects of securities litigation. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:44 pm
Not only did the Court deny Ex-Husband’s request to terminate alimony but the Court also wrote a letter to the IRS, State Division of Taxation, the Sussex County Prosecutor and the Social Security Administration. [read post]
