Search for: "Prince et al v. The United States Of America"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
Oracle America Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
Oracle America Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435, filed in the United States District Court Central District of California, claimed the two works were "in many ways identical". [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Center for Social Change, Inc. et al v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Medellin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 4:30 pm
ArgentinaPavolotzki, Claudio et. al v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Bartrip, Beyond the Factory Gates: Asbestos and Health in Twentieth Century America 77 & n.4 (2006); Peter W.J. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Keith Sullivan Team Members: Arthur Muller (3L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Kiera Fitzpatrick (3L), Alex Zugaro (3L) The competition involved a criminal case of the United States of America v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
