Search for: "Private Lenders Group, Inc. v. Does 1-11" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
 See prior post on this blog: Seeing No Evil Texas Supreme Court blesses diversion of lawsuit against payday lender over egregious criminal collection tactics into private arbitration. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
That applies both to the San Antonio Court of Appeals and the Fifth Circuit panel in this example.Overall, the ratio would be 11 for arbitration and 6 against based on waiver. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Kate Waldock
(Sep. 25, 2020), https://www.thefashionlaw.com/neiman-marcus-v-marble-ridge-capital-the-story-behind-the-1-billion-plus-legal-battle. [9] See Cantrell, supra note 1. [10] Id. [11] 11 U.S.C. [read post]
The recent decision In re Washington Mutual, Inc. [2] (which was followed even more recently in In re Accuride Corporation [3]) applies the disclosure requirements in Rule 2019 to members of an ad hoc group participating in a Chapter 11 case. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Moreover, the terms stated on Page 1 were not agreed to by both parties because the lender had not yet approved the loan.So, Page 1, without more, does not constitute an executed loan contract, or an integrated one. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
TAX AND STAMP DUTY CONSIDERATIONS Interest paid to non-resident lenders is generally subject to a 19 per cent withholding tax unless (i) the rate is reduced by virtue of a tax treaty between Spain and the jurisdiction of the non-resident lender or (ii) the interest is paid to a resident in another EU Member State, provided that such non-resident lender, being the beneficial owner of the interest, does not operate in Spain… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
[11]      The action against BP (“the BP case”) contains the following conclusions, read short: Count and reckoning of BP’s intromissions from 1 March 2006 to 31 July 2006 with HC’s funds received into its client account, and payment of any balance due. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a direct listing, however, the company does not typically issue new shares. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Once in bankruptcy and dependent on external financing, the debtor and a Chapter 11 lender negotiate a Chapter 11 financing agreement that includes control rights for the Chapter 11 lender, who is often the pre-bankruptcy secured lender. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Further, PPP sponsors and lenders may be rightfully concerned about the prospects of executing such transactions. [read post]