Search for: "Private Lenders Group, Inc. v. Does 1-11"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
Access does, however, take issue with certain facts alleged by plaintiff, and asserts that:1. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
Profiles, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
See prior post on this blog: Seeing No Evil Texas Supreme Court blesses diversion of lawsuit against payday lender over egregious criminal collection tactics into private arbitration. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
In Simien v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
" We affirm.[1]I. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Private International Law and the Downturn 1. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
That applies both to the San Antonio Court of Appeals and the Fifth Circuit panel in this example.Overall, the ratio would be 11 for arbitration and 6 against based on waiver. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
(Sep. 25, 2020), https://www.thefashionlaw.com/neiman-marcus-v-marble-ridge-capital-the-story-behind-the-1-billion-plus-legal-battle. [9] See Cantrell, supra note 1. [10] Id. [11] 11 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:15 am
The recent decision In re Washington Mutual, Inc. [2] (which was followed even more recently in In re Accuride Corporation [3]) applies the disclosure requirements in Rule 2019 to members of an ad hoc group participating in a Chapter 11 case. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
Moreover, the terms stated on Page 1 were not agreed to by both parties because the lender had not yet approved the loan.So, Page 1, without more, does not constitute an executed loan contract, or an integrated one. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
” Yes, the statute really does have a full cite to the opinion in it. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am
TAX AND STAMP DUTY CONSIDERATIONS Interest paid to non-resident lenders is generally subject to a 19 per cent withholding tax unless (i) the rate is reduced by virtue of a tax treaty between Spain and the jurisdiction of the non-resident lender or (ii) the interest is paid to a resident in another EU Member State, provided that such non-resident lender, being the beneficial owner of the interest, does not operate in Spain… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
[11] The action against BP (“the BP case”) contains the following conclusions, read short: Count and reckoning of BP’s intromissions from 1 March 2006 to 31 July 2006 with HC’s funds received into its client account, and payment of any balance due. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In a direct listing, however, the company does not typically issue new shares. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Once in bankruptcy and dependent on external financing, the debtor and a Chapter 11 lender negotiate a Chapter 11 financing agreement that includes control rights for the Chapter 11 lender, who is often the pre-bankruptcy secured lender. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Further, PPP sponsors and lenders may be rightfully concerned about the prospects of executing such transactions. [read post]