Search for: "Public Utility District No 2 of Grant County"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 10:28 pm
Section 14(E)(12) allows the Board to grant a conditional use permit for any structure that is used by a public utility company for public utility purpose. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
Rather, the company must (1) own, control, operate or manage utility assets within Illinois; and (2) offer those assets for public use without discrimination. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
Stratford Public Utility District (Sandridge Partners, L.P., et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
In an opinion originally filed on September 8, and subsequently modified and certified for partial publication on October 4, 2023, the Sixth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ setting aside Monterey County’s issuance of a permit to investor-owned public utility/water supplier California-American Water Company (“Cal-Am”) to construct a desalination plant and related facilities… [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm
Section (a)(2) further explains that public work is work done for “irrigation, utility, reclamation” and District improvement. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 5:30 am
Washington State’s Grant County Public Utility District #2 has been fined $35,000 for five serious safety violations following an explosion at its Priest Rapids Dam in Beverly. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
“I fought the law and the law won” – The Crickets In an opinion filed July 19, and later ordered published on August 16, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) reversed the trial court’s grant of a preliminary injunction in a CEQA action enjoining the Santa Barbara County Road Commissioner from enforcing public laws by removing unpermitted encroachments from a public right-of-way. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm
The Council would thereafter create an “Underground Utility District” for the selected blocks to be completed with the year’s funding; residents/owners within the district would be mailed a notice of public hearing and a map so they could comment prior to Council’s approval of creation of the district. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:58 am
November 30-December 2: Evidentiary hearing. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Pa. 1795). 2 Mich 425 (1852). 2 U.S. 304 (1795). 2 U.S. 304, 311; 2 Dal 304; 1 L.Ed 391 (Cir. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
(See helpful photo on p. 2 of Rails-to-Trails’ Brief) In 2009, the non-profit organization, Rails-to-Trails of Wayne County (“Rails-to-Trails”), bought the Disputed Property from its predecessor in interest, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, successor by merger to Conrail Corporation (“the Railroad”), with the intent of converting it into a public trail. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
After argument, the trial judge granted the County's [Court Rules] 12(b)(6) motion, determining as a matter of law that records of private cell phone use can never be public records under the PRA. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
The district court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:40 pm
Justin Fawson (R-North Ogden) sponsored House Bill 326 seeking to, among other things: (1) change the election process for district trustees; (2) place districts under the jurisdiction of cities and/or counties and grant them authority to audit districts; and (3) changing the process for dissolving districts. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
County of Marin (2004 [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
The County, as lead agency, prepared and certified an EIR before granting that approval (with a statement of overriding considerations) and Appellants then judicially challenged it on numerous CEQA and general plan consistency grounds. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
Just for clarity sake I use the examples of Water District and Sewer District Commissioners to mean an elected official who serves on a council responsible for the administration, oversight, or funding of a municipal corporation such as a public utility. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
The Planning Commission’s decision was further appealed to the Board of Supervisors (“Board”), which granted the appeals to deny utilization of the Section 15183 exemption and, in so doing, rejected its own staff’s recommendation. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 11:59 am
A district court judge in Chicago granted the motion of defendant Ryobi Technologies Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
It grants the lead agency discretion not to utilize the other agency’s thresholds and environmental standards and to formulate standards of significance of its own for determining the significance of a project’s impact. [read post]
