Search for: "R. C. V."
Results 1 - 20
of 23,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:41 am
R v C [2009] UKHL 42; [2009] WLR (D) 272 “The words of s 30(2)(a) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 ‘or for any other reason’ were wide enough to include an irrational fear preventing the free exercise of choice, and inability to communicate the choice made within s 30(2)(b) was not limited to physical inability. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
*R v C [2010] (CA) [Expert evidence - DNA] D was alleged to have raped V at her house many years previously. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm
*R v C [2010] (CA) [Expert evidence - DNA] D was alleged to have raped V at her house many years previously. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:49 am
C & R Restaurants LLC et al Another BMI case. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:26 am
C v D and another [2010] EWHC 2940 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 292 “A time-limited offer was not capable of being an offer within the meaning of CPR Pt 36, which established that an offer must be capable of acceptance unless and until withdrawn by service of a notice within CPR r 36.9(2). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v Fazal [2009] WLR (D) 175 “A defendant who allowed another person to lodge, receive, retain or withdraw money which amounted to criminal property from the defendant's bank account, was to be regarded as having converted that property for the purposes of s 327(1)(c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland), heard 7 July 2016. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm
R. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:06 pm
R. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
R C & Sons Judgment: www.mainepersonalinjurylaw.com/uploads/file/Davis v_ R C Paving.pdf [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:32 am
That was the difficult question the Supreme Court had to grapple with in the case of R(C) v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:37 pm
In Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
R (Moore) v Skipton Fund Ltd [2010] EWHC 3070 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 308 “For the purposes of a claim for an ex gratia payment from public funds, there was nothing irrational or unfair in requiring certain people infected with hepatitis C through treatment with NHS blood or blood products prior to September 1991, to show that spontaneous clearance of the virus after a period of six months had occurred. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:54 am
HOHENLOHE and NORA R. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:36 am
R (Heffernan) v Rent Service; [2008] WLR (D) 279 “Rent officers, in identifying the ‘locality’ under Sch 1, Pt I to the Rent Officers (Housing Benefit Functions) Order 1997, as amended, needed to assemble only enough ‘neighbourhoods’ to satisfy the requirements of para 4(6)(c). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:32 am
First, there are the linked cases R (on the application of GC) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and R (on the application of C) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, being heard from Monday 31 January to Tuesday [...] [read post]
