Search for: "RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 9:34 pm
The case cite is Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:46 am
In re Tri-Coastal Design Group, Inc., Serial No. 85302240 (July 25, 2013) [not precedential] [APPLE BROWN SUGAR for bath soaps, lip gloss, scented oils].In re Douglas John Shuntich, Serial No. 85369587 (Auguest 5, 2013) [not precedential] [SUPERCOOLER for countertop and portable household refrigerator/freezer].In re Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., Serial No. 85445340 (August 6, 2013) [not precedential] [NATIONAL PLAY CATCH MONTH for… [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:11 pm
” The case cite is Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:04 am
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 3:01 pm
The company’s refusal to share its investigative files before examining her is reasonable and did not breach a duty of good faith. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:09 pm
Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(Counterfeit Chic) (LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION) (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Steve van Dulken’s blog on patents and IP) TTAB enters summary judgment under section 2(e)(5), cancelling registration for baseball training glove design due to functionality: Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(IP tango) Is football in Brazil a sport or a religion? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Patently-O) Change in patent reexamination stalls Texas litigation: SouthWire Company v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:14 am
Rawlings Sporting Goods Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm
You said this was good for the middle class, but your example was 25 people for whom © is very good. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:15 am
Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Inc., No. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon – Federal Circuit… [read post]
