Search for: "ROYAL PURPLE, LLC" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2013, 1:25 pm
Indianapolis, IN - Trademark lawyers for Royal Purple, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana sued Liqui Moly GmbH of Ulm, Germany in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark infringement for selling purple automotive lubricants. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
Indianapolis, Indiana -- Royal Purple, LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana has sued Compressor Parts of Holland, Ohio; Michael Klipstein ("Klipstein") and Southern Parts & Engineering Company, LLC ("Southern Parts") of Alpharetta, Georgia (collectively, "Defendants") for infringement of the trademarks ROYAL PURPLE and SYNFILM, which have been registered by the U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:02 pm
Royal Purple Sues Liqui Moly GmbH and Liqui Moly USA for Trademark Infringement Indianapolis, Indiana -- Royal Purple, LLC ("Royal Purple") of Indianapolis, Indiana sued Liqui Moly GmbH of Ulm, Germany and Liqui Moly USA, Inc. of Hauppauge, New York (collectively, "Liqui Moly") alleging infringement of two marks, Registration Nos. 2,691,774 and 2,953,996, which have been registered with the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:38 am by Paul Bost and Nancy Ly
In this matter, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissed an opposition without prejudice in this precedential opinion because the party that filed the opposition was different from the party that sought and obtained an extension of time to file the opposition. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:38 am by Paul Bost and Nancy Ly
In this matter, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board dismissed an opposition without prejudice in this precedential opinion because the party that filed the opposition was different from the party that sought and obtained an extension of time to file the opposition. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:23 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
The following colors and patterns have been recalled: black, hot pink, lime, purple, royal blue, ruby red, and baseball, basketball, football and soccer ball. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Cir.1983), aff’g 213 USPQ 594 (TTAB 1982) [most recently followed in NPG Records, LLC and Paisley Park Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
| 2019 updates to the EPO Guidelines for Examination - the highlights | GSK fails in purple inhaler passing off claim against Sandoz and Vectura (...and breathe) | When it's time to pay for copyright infringement: the new "fork in the road" under Colombian law | Book Review: Digital Copyright Law and Practice | Beijing Internet Court: whether a short video is original or not has nothing to do with its length | Book Review: The Law of Domain Names and Cybersquatting Never… [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
In re Royal Wine Corporation, Serial No. 85775626 (October 16, 2013) [not precedential]. . . . [read post]