Search for: "Rehrig Pacific Company " Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2013, 5:20 am
Several years ago, one of those affiliated brands, Sara Lee Corporation ("Sara Lee") approached the defendant, Rehrig Pacific Company ("Rehrig"), to request that Rehrig design a tray that was both compatible with and similar to the NPL663 tray. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:36 am by Docket Navigator
Rehrig Pacific Company, 2-12-cv-01073 (WIED September 10, 2013, Order) (Stadtmueller, J.). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:53 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC notedDuring reexamination, “the PTO must give claims their broadest reasonable construction consistent with the specification. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
In last week’s discussion on the topic of declaration usage in patent reexamination, we explained the benefit of such evidence in close cases, illustrated by both the dissent and majority comments on the limited evidence of record in ex parte Rehrig Pacific Company Several days after the Rehrig Pacific decision, the BPAI once again emphasized the importance of such evidence. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In this post we will discuss the first case, ex parte Rehrig Pacific Company In ex parte Rehrig Pacific Company, had declaration evidence been submitted, the outcome may have been very different. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 10:04 am
Futura S.R.L., 2003 WL 22671466 (S.D.N.Y. 2003); Rehrig Pacific Co. v. [read post]