Search for: "Responsible Development v. BNSF Railway Company" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
BNSF Railway Company[2] was the first fully litigated case against an employer for violating BIPA, in the wake of massive settlements involving tech companies including Facebook ($650 million)[3], Google ($100 million)[4], TikTok ($92 million)[5], and Snapchat ($35 million).[6]   Meanwhile, the Illinois Supreme Court in West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Employed by a company that was responsible for intermodal operations at a BNSF railyard, the applicant applied to the railway company for a safety sensitive job when it took over operations of the yard. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am by Lorene Park
The court affirmed a ruling that the company and its president violated a 2007 injunction against oppressive child labor and an order to pay $200,000 to compensate the children (Acosta v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
BNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
It not only introduces corporate responsibility for human rights violations and environmental damage – as already found in some national laws (e.g. in France; Germany; Netherlands; Norway; Switzerland; United Kingdom) – but also and in contrast (with the exception of French law – for more details see Camy) introduces civil liability. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
” In response to those rulings, EPA in 2015 promulgated new regulations defining the term, commonly known as the “WOTUS Rule. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]