Search for: "Richardson v. Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2015, 6:18 am by Howard Friedman
Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (3d Cir., Feb. 9, 2015), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a Muslim inmate's challenge to prison policies on participation in feasts of Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, and to the use of prayer oils during religious services.In Harris v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:02 am by Howard Friedman
Cook County Department of Corrections, 2016 Ill. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:39 am by Susan Brenner
He examined Skow’s computer in an office at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:18 am by Stephen Bilkis
The court remanded the father to the custody of the Department of Corrections pursuant to Family Ct Act § 153, and directed that he be produced in court at 9:00 A.M. on December 23, 2004, for a hearing, with no adjournments. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 8:46 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Department of Labor says these changes are needed to correct “wage stagnation” over the past 20 years. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Richardson opined that the stories had serious literary value under a narrow definition of literary value.U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
Richardson & Anor v DPP, heard 12 November 2013. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Richardson ruled in July 1992. ''The facts show the defendant is a mentally disordered sex offender. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
(emphasis added) Any sentence outside of the Guidelines must be reported to the Department of Justice. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
So on only our third try, we were correct that Justice Neil Gorsuch would fully participate in the court’s conference (with the usual number of incidental recusals) to discuss potential grants and the like. [read post]