Search for: "Robert Printz" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 10:14 am by Randy Barnett
U.S.) and executive officials (in Printz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 11:30 am
.' " (Concurring opinion in Printz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:51 pm
 Of course, it’s not just Printz that got in the way. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
As the resident federalism nut on this blog, I feel obliged to offer a federalism scorecard for the Roberts Court's '07-'08 term. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:01 am by Randy Barnett
  They were 5-4 decisions, as was Printz. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm by Jim von der Heydt
 Lopez, Morrison, and Printz were ready to be picked up and turned loose. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:03 pm
So, maybe he‘ll provide the fifth vote to strike down the law and we won’t have to worry about Roberts or Alito replacing O’Connor’s vote? [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by JB
Even the Rehnquist and Roberts Court's federalism doctrines have altered the New Deal settlement only at the margins. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Misunderstanding Preemption In the early Nineteenth Century, New York granted a monopoly to steamboat inventors Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston to operate along the state’s waterways. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 8:42 am by Randy Barnett
Moreover, in his dissenting opinion in Comstock, Justice Thomas quotes from Justice Scalia’s opinion in Printz about the Necessary and Proper Clause being the last best hope of those who would defend the ultra vires powers of Congress, suggesting that Justice Scalia still hold that view. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  But, the opinion relies on prior federalism opinions such as New York and Printz, which are heavy on dual sovereignty and light on cooperative federalism. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Randy Barnett
  Or did these cases (along with cases such as New York, Printz and Alden) establish a post-New Deal baseline (“this far and no farther”) beyond which Congress may not go without meeting a serious burden of justification? [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
” Briefly: The Student Printz reports that Justice Scalia will speak at the University of Southern Mississippi. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:49 am by Daniel Shaviro
 I'll just discuss two of the doctrines here: anti-commandeering and anti-coercion (the third pertains to sovereign immunity).Anti-commandeering featured in a recent case, Printz, that barred the federal government (through the Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act) from requiring state and local officials to run background checks on prospective handgun purchasers. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]