Search for: "Robert S Jaffe" Results 1 - 20 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  In November 2010, Jaffe and Cohmad settled with the SEC, who charged Jaffe of receiving tens of millions of dollars in compensation from Madoff’s firm for investments that never took place. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 2:24 pm
mod=googlenews_wsjRegulators probing aspects of Bernard Madoff's alleged fraud are intensifying pressure on Robert Jaffe, a Cohmad Securities official who helped recruit investors for Mr. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:54 pm by Securites Lawprof
Jaffe, a part-owner of Cohmad Securities Corp., to pay $1.1 million plus interest to a group of investors formed to invest in Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sampson at the new York City offices of Bryant Burgher Jaffe & Roberts LLP. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:04 am
"And just when it appeared that we were turning the corner on Jaffe and Lerner's fallacies, it appears that there will be a whole new front opening up on patents reducing R&D and not being good for anybody (except drug companies). [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Joe Patrice
Clair, Daniel Jaffe, Dennis Wasser, Divorce Train Wrecks, Donald Schiller, Earle Lilly, Fiona Shackleton, Gloria Allred, Ira Elegant, Laura Wasser, Mark Vincent Kaplan, Media and Journalism, Rankings, Raoul Felder, Robert Stephan Cohen, Sandra Davis, Sorrell Trope, William S. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:22 am
They finally got Robert Jaffe, a crucial witness to Madoff's operation, to the Hub where he finally spoke to regulators. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:21 am
To this day, Lemley and Moore never corrected the false statement they made about Robert Clarke (that's "George" Clarke to readers of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents).In its comments on proposed rules changes on continuing applications, the USPTO cited the wrong page of the Lemley and Moore article.See articles in Kent-JIP andwww.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert2.pdf [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
"] Second, investigation of the method of Quillen and Webster by Robert Clarke (misidentified as George Clarke by Jaffe and Lerner in footnote 163 at page 222) showed the method was inaccurate. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
  Most are patent focused, but I’m particularly looking forward to Robert Cote’s talk on Funding IP and Seth Jaffes discussion of CyberSecurity. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:28 pm
Recently, the President of the Harvard Mediation Program, 2L Becky Jaffe filled us in on the program’s kickoff event where representatives from Harvard Negotiators, Harvard Mediation Program, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, and the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program were on hand to talk about their plans for the upcoming year and to answer questions. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
A post by Noel Le at weblog.ipcentral.info, titled Innovation is Not That Discontent, indicates that there is a new version of Innovation and Its Discontents with a new preface.Le suggests that Jaffe and Lerner are pushing issues with patent administration and patent quality.IPBiz wonders if the new version corrects the misnaming of Robert Clarke as "George" Clarke or the references to Rochelle "Dreyfus. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 12:29 pm by Mary Whisner
In November, Stanford's Robert Crown Law Library launched a multimedia site with material from the project (including material that the ABA has never posted).For different trailblazers, the Stanford site has photos, oral history transcripts, audiorecordings, videorecordings, and photographs. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:10 pm
But by July, Jaffe, Roberts & Schiller was dead. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:10 am by Ritika Singh
Here’s some reading for the negotiators: Robert Einhorn of the Brookings Institution released an important paper entitled “Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: Requirements for a Comprehensive Nuclear Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 6:49 am
Robert Clarke is the person erroneously referred to as George Clarke in Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents.The other blog cites Patrick Doody's "The Patent System is Not Broken" for debunking the 97% number, although Doody's paper is mainly about patent academics repeating the (mis)analysis of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents (and consequences thereof). [read post]