Search for: "Roberts v. Reed, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 6:43 am by Megan Gardner
Reed’s decision in Chase et al. v. 360 General Contracting, (Supreme Court, County of New York Index No. 152275/2016) dismissed and vacated two separate mechanic’s liens filed against a cooperative unit. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:43 am by Megan Gardner
Reed’s decision in Chase et al. v. 360 General Contracting, (Supreme Court, County of New York Index No. 152275/2016) dismissed and vacated two separate mechanic’s liens filed against a cooperative unit. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:43 am by Megan Gardner
Reed’s decision in Chase et al. v. 360 General Contracting, (Supreme Court, County of New York Index No. 152275/2016) dismissed and vacated two separate mechanic’s liens filed against a cooperative unit. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:13 am by Dan Tench
Yesterday’s decision of the US Supreme Court in NFIB et al v Sebelius regarding the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”, aka Obamacare), which has convulsed the American political scene, usefully illustrates the important differences between the US Court and its UK equivalent. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
My book also features a slashing constitutional critique of the exclusionary rule, placing my views in line with — actually to the right of — Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas Alito, and opposed to the views typically championed by Justices Ginsburg and Breyer (and before them, Justices Stevens, Souter, Brennan, Marshall, et al.). [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
"Justice Thomas's mantra of fidelity to "original meaning" appears to be an effort to portray himself as a practitioner of the “New Originalism,” a school of thought that (in theory) has abandoned the old-fashioned, discredited “old originalism” ideas (associated with Robert Bork, et al.) that the Constitution should be interpreted according to the Framers’ intentions or expectations in favor of… [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
At about 12:40 p.m., Chief Justice Warren began to read his opinion for the Court in Case Number One on that Term’s docket, Oliver Brown et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
District Court Judge Reed O’Connor in the Northern District of Texas declared the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional in an opinion in Brackeen et. al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
  [Disclosure:  Howe & Russell represented respondents Irvin Muchnick et al. in the case.] [read post]