Search for: "Rolex Watch USA Inc"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
As for the injunction, the Fifth Circuit agreed with Rolex that the district court should have enjoined the sale of Rolex watches with non-genuine bezels, thus affirming, as modified, the district court’s injunction in part (Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:27 am
The case is Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:00 am
An upscale Suffolk County watch and jewelry retailer, Maddaloni Jewelers, Inc., claimed that luxury wristwatch manufacturer, Rolex Watch USA, Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:12 am
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
LY USA, Inc., No. 08-4483-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
Citing Rolex Watch v. [read post]
