Search for: "Rose v. Sage"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 5:29 am
In New York, the case of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 11:53 am
Nelson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:29 am
The rule in New York concerning whether a client is entitled to look at and copy a file is generally set forth in Matter of Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, 91 NY2d 30 [1997] The Court of Appeals held that the joined the "majority of courts and State legal ethics advisory bodies," which take the position that "upon termination of the attorney-client relationship, where no claim for unpaid… [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Comics v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Slip op. at *5-*6 (hyperlink added) (citing Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations… [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:19 am
Wyly sought to obtain the privileged work product of lead counsel in order to assess the legal analysis supporting the recommended $134 million settlement.The Appellate Division refused to grant Wyly's requested relief, concluding that the cited legal authority of a prior decision, styled Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
The trial court agreed, relying on Matter of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The First Department recently relied upon the Deerin rule to affirm disqualification in Poretsky v Bartleby and Sage, Inc. (203 AD3d 523 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Just a couple of weeks agok, the court in Chen v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
In Matter of Sage Realty Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2010.Rose, Julie L. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
Acuff-Rose case. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
” Thus, it cannot be said that defendants’ actions in manufacturing or distributing FDA-approved vaccines to [plaintiff] rose to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct or that severe emotional distress was substantially certain to result from their conduct.Reilly v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 11:50 pm
There was a case in 1996, (Princeton University Press v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
These cases are Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
