Search for: "S. et al v. State of Hawaii et al" Results 1 - 20 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Merits briefs for petitioners are due Thursday in Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
The transcript for Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:17 am by Record on Appeal
Neil Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawaii, et al., SCPW-11-0000732 and Michael J. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:46 am by Record on Appeal
In a published opinion by Judge Foley released yesterday by the ICA (panel: CJ Nakamura, Foley, Fujise), the ICA vacated the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment on the issue of whether the political question doctrine governs the issue of the Hawaii Legislature’s funding of DHHL: Richard Nelson III et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:25 pm by Record on Appeal
Neil Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawaii, et al., SCPW-11-0000732 & Michael J. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:35 am by charley foster
District Court's Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order in Emmanuel Temple, et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:45 pm by Record on Appeal
In a case we designated as a writ to watch here, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday (October 6, 2011) in Richard Nelson III et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:45 pm
Via scotusblog: The Court has released the opinion in Hawaii, et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:31 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Trump et al., No. 17-35105:The State of Hawaii's emergency motion to intervene (Docket Entry No. 21) is denied for the purposes of this appeal only. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:23 pm by Record on Appeal
Yesterday, May 9, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion authored by Justice McKenna in Richard Nelson III et al. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:06 pm by Elijah Yip
  Hawaii Defense Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:06 pm by John Bellinger
On April 25, when the Supreme Court hears argument in Hawaii v Trump, the challenge to President Trump’s third executive order imposing a travel ban on nationals from eight countries (“EO-3”), the Court will have received the views not only of the parties but of numerous other interested individuals, organizations, and states who have submitted 73 amicus briefs. [read post]