Search for: "SATIR v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2019, 7:53 am by INFORRM
Decisions this Week United StatesSpeech First, INC. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile today marks the start of the Hilary Legal Term in England and Wales. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by INFORRM
. ● New Special Collection Paper – Humor and Free Speech: A Comparative Analysis of Global Case Law by Alberto Godioli and Jennifer Young of the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
This issue includes an exploration of the new Australian 'parody' defence to an action for copyright infringement by Jani McCutcheon, who lectures at the University of Western Australia (the IPKat says, he's looking forward to an exhibition of bad reproductions of the doggie pic in Rogers v Koons, which seem to spring up wherever satire and parody are discussed). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
On 23 January 2020 there was an application in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers before Steyn J. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am by Charon QC
She lectures regularly on the Bribery Act 2010 and has co-authored two articles on the subject (Archbold News June 2010 edition and July 2011). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
News of the World was back in the news for a scandal other than its own, when the former Pakistan cricket captain, two bowlers and a cricket agent were imprisoned for a conspiracy to bowl no-bowls in last year’s test match against England. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources MsLods’ Law+tech news round up, 29 December 2016 Looking Above and Beyond the Blunt Expectation: Specified Request As the Recommended Approach to Intermediary Liability in Cyberspace, European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol 7, No 3 (2016), Krzysztof Kornel Garstka Satire in Defamation Law: Toward a Critical Understanding, Review of Litigation, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2016, Jeff Todd, Texas State University, San Marcos –… [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Brett Wilson Media and Communication Blog has published an article on proving the extent of Twibel claims following three of the most high-profile libel trials in England and Wales in 2022 (Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EWHC 1417 (QB), Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB), Riley v Sivier [2022] EWHC 2891 (KB)). [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
A quip about New England winters is unlikely to get a laugh in Alaska. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:17 am
Who, but it is his love of words, satire and humor combined with a very Dr. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
This led to polarizing Fox News-like media groups. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
  I can report, however, that I am enjoying his new satire Bleak Spouse . [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
Do you think the history and culture of England and Wales means we are unlikely to accept a general duty of good faith? [read post]