Search for: "SCA Personal Care, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Ernie Svenson
” If Zuckerberg didn’t care much to help lawyers before Facebook became a big deal, he probably cares even less now. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
, Inc., decided on May 7, is the latest case dealing with ownership of digital assets after death. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:53 pm by Robert Milligan
 However, extra care must be given to employee personal accounts, particularly when the employee saves login information on the computer and the login information is used to access the employee’s personal accounts. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:14 am by Chijioke Okorie
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) upheld the judgment of the High Court and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cook Medical LLC, No. 16-127 (SCA Redux); Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:08 pm by Ken Shigley
(employer access to employee’s social media tortious invasion of privacy and violations of the SCA); Konop v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Cook Medical LLC, No. 16-127 (SCA Redux); Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:35 am by Eric Goldman
“Plaintiff’s allegation that Facebook owed him a duty of care to keep his personal information safe is contradicted by the terms of the SRR, which expressly disclaim such a duty. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Civil Procdedure – Final Judgment: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
§§ 2601, et seq., (“FMLA”), to require employers who are subject to the FMLA to provide gay and lesbian employees unpaid time off to care for newborns or a non-adoptive, non-biological child with a serious health condition, a right that has been available to heterosexual employees for nearly two decades.Ninth Circuit affirms Gap, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 1:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Code Section 4980H rules are only one of a plethora of federal mandates and rules applicable to group health plans and their employers under federal law as a result of the health care reforms of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA) as well as a host of previously enacted federal laws. [read post]