Search for: "SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 9:30 am
The Shinnecock Nation received official recognition on Tuesday, 6/15/2010 from the Federal Government. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:08 am
Here are the materials in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:19 am
Here are the materials in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:19 am
Here are the materials in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Finding that the two marks shown below, for cigarettes, falsely suggest a connection with the Shinnecock Indian Nation, the TTAB affirmed the PTO's Section 2(a) refusals to register. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:15 am
Cayuga Indian Nation v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 6:18 am
Here: Shinnecock Opening Brief US Response Brief Shinnecock Reply Brief Lower court materials here. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:04 am
The Shinnecock Indian Nation ended its 30 year battle for federal recognition yesterday, with the Bureau of Indian Affairs approving the Long Island tribe's petition. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:00 pm
The Board found that the marks falsely suggest a connection with the Shinnecock Indian Nation. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Here: Shinnecock Cert Petition 15-1215acFederalIndianLawProfessors NY Cert Opp Lower court materials here. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 8:52 am
For two decades, the Shinnecock Indian Nation has tried and failed to open a casino near Manhattan in the hope that a gambling hall would be an economic engine to wrest them from poverty and fund social programs.Now the tribe has its eye on a new location: its home in the Hamptons.The Shinnecock Hamptons Casino is expected to rise on the tribe’s reservation here on the East End of Long Island as early as 2023.Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New… [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:58 am
Here is the opinion in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
The TTAB affirmed the PTO's Section 2(a) refusal to register the two marks shown below, for cigarettes, on the ground that they falsely suggest a connection with the Shinnecock Indian Nation.Applicant/Appellant argues that the Shinnecock Indian Nation is a sovereign government and is neither a "person" nor an "institution" under Section 45, and therefore that Section 2(a) does not apply.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:22 am
The Bureau of Indian Affairs acknowledged the Shinnecock Indian Nation in a Final Determination in June of this year. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
Petition was filed in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:32 pm
A little over a week ago the United States Interior Board of Indian Appeals dismissed two requests for reconsideration of the Department of the Interior’s Final Determination for Federal Acknowledgment of the Nation. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:41 pm
Narragansett Tribe (breach of contract)Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Petition was filed in Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm
NLRB (National Labor Relations Act); 5) Shinnecock Indian Nation v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:49 am
Without doors: Native nations and the Convention. [read post]
