Search for: "SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 10:37 am
Supreme Court are denied, the Pennsylvania Superior Court is often the final arbiter for a litigant in Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
Earlier this month I had the opportunity to accompany one of the partners of the firm to the Pennsylvania Superior Court. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:02 pm
ErosionThe Pennsylvania Superior Court recently upheld a household exclusion in the case of Erie Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed current status of Pennsylvania law on the doctrine of forum non conveniens relative to a matter involving a consolidation of appeals in two separate cases.The Superior Court noted that conveniens, not the pursuit of verdicts in Plaintiff-friendly venues, is the reason why Plaintiffs have the initial choice of venue. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court provided guidance on their required elements for expert testimony to be admissible in a medical malpractice case.In its decision, the Pennsylvania Superior reserved a trial court’s grant of a nonsuit in favor of a Defendant surgeon in a negligence case filed under allegations that one of his patients had died of a pulmonary embolism following surgery.At the trial court level, the Defendants moved… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a Dauphin County trial court decision that an insurance company may be still be liable for attorney’s fees under the First Party Medical Benefits Statute, 75 Pa.C.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed the current status of the law of spoliation of evidence in Pennsylvania. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 5:35 am
Tort Talkers may recall that the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Erie Ins. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
In reversing the entry of summary judgment on the limited tort question, the Pennsylvania Superior Court emphasized that an impairment need not be permanent in order to be serious. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:53 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court dismissed the appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
As such, the Superior Court found that the trial court judge could not know whether the jurors could really be fair and impartial.Given that the jurors’ answers expressed the “slightest ground of prejudice” required for their dismissal from the jury pool, the appellate court stated that the trial court should have granted the motions to strike the jurors for cause.As such, while it appears that a trial court judge may not be… [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
However, the Pennsylvania Superior Court also noted that the statute of limitations under this provision is subject to an equitable tolling for “affirmative misrepresentation or fraudulent concealment of the cause of death. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Click here to view the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Sehl v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 9:27 am
Accordingly, the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the trial court’s granting of the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:00 am
The Superior Court noted that the device maker engaged in relevant acts with an in-state company in Pennsylvania and was liable for in-state FDA-related conduct in Pennsylvania. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
The Superior Court also ruled that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:09 am
The event is sponsored jointly by the PA Superior Court, the Wilkes Barre Law and Library Association and the Lackawanna County Bar Association. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:21 pm
Today, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued another opinion on the subject. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court revisited the Trivial Defect Doctrine most recently in the case of Reinoso v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:53 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the execution of an insurance application form did not constitute a valid request for reduced underinsured (UIM) motorist benefits coverage. [read post]
