Search for: "SUPERVISORS, Does 1 - 3"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,682
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
No. 3, further clarified the application of the supervisor approval requirement under section 6751(b)(1), which has been a key issue since Chai v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:59 am
The LAD does not make supervisors or other individuals directly liable for engaging in prohibited discrimination or harassment. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:15 pm
1. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
3) Are the current supervisor’s ratings justifiable? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:55 pm
In these other situations, such as where a supervisor sexually harasses the employee, the employee does not have to show one of these specific acts by the employer to prevail on constructive discharge. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
As we mentioned in Part 1, a claims supervisor is not exactly a cake job. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:04 am
Here are some tips: 1. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:02 am
Given that the Labour Affairs Officer had already investigated the work refusal, the Regional Director had only three options under sections 129(4) and 128(13) of the Canada Labour Code: “1) agree that a danger exists; 2) agree that a danger exists but consider that the refusal puts the life, health or safety of another person directly in danger or that the danger is a normal condition of employment; and 3) determine that a danger does not exist. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
In rejecting these disability-based claims, the Court of Appeal held that inability to work under a particular supervisor because of the anxiety and stress related to the supervisor’s oversight does not rise to the level of a disability recognized under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:00 pm
1. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:59 pm
Worse, the newest decision simply does not reflect the reality of a more modern, flexible workplace. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
It is important to note that this narrower definition of supervisor probably does not apply under New Jersey or New York City law, and may not apply under New York law. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 pm
District 1, Supervisor Scott Haggerty Phone number:(510) 272-6691 Aide: shawn.wilson@acgov.org District 2, Supervisor Richard Valle:Phone number: (510) 272-6692 Aide: christopher.miley@acgov.org District 3, Supervisor Wilma Chan Phone number: (510)272-6693 Aide:jeanette.dong@acgov.org District 4, Supervisor Nate Miley Phone number: (510)272-6694 Aide: anna.gee@acgov.org District 5, Supervisor Keith Carson Phone number:… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:17 pm
Here are five key concepts employers must understand about the liability that could be created by managerial employees. 1. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:22 am
1. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:46 am
3. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
The term "customarily and regularly" does not include isolated or one-time tasks. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 12:15 pm
Although the Amended PHELO is substantially similar to the previous version, it includes three key changes in that it (1) expands the definition of covered employees; (2) clarifies the calculation and availability of leave; and (3) modifies leave guaranteed to health care providers and emergency responders. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
To establish a hostile work environment claim, Vance had to show:(1) the work environment is objectively and subjectively offensive; (2) the conduct was based on race; (3) the conduct was either severe and pervasive; (4) employer liability. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 6:12 am
<img src="//feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/9kq-vxDAtCI" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
