Search for: "Safe Harbor Ventures, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 10:10 am by Eric Goldman
By making it so Google can’t even win on summary judgment, rulings like this just reinforce how Section 230(c)(2) is a useless safe harbor. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:56 pm by Milord A. Keshishian
Oct. 24, 2012) (dismissing copyright infringement claim with leave to amend where defendants likely entitled to safe harbor protection). [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 10:15 am by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Wells Bowen Realty, Inc., 736 F.3d 722 (6th 2013). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:31 pm by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc., 736 F.3d 722 (6th 2013), refused to impose a bona fide settlement service provider condition on the ability to qualify for the affiliated business arrangement safe harbor. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:35 am by John Jascob
The group also urged the SEC to find a way to promote company research, such as a safe harbor for pre-IPO research, which it believes would improve the trading environment for these stocks.These recommendations are just a beginning, the group wrote, and it plans to continue to develop ideas to help incentivize more companies to go public.The other signatories to the letter are the Intercontinental Exchange; Equity Dealers of America; Steven Bochner, a partner at Wilson Sonsini;… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:38 am by Eric
To me, this opinion exemplifies the weakness of the 512 safe harbor design (see my recent blog post on optimal safe harbor design for more). [read post]
  Under a new IRS safe harbor rule, you may be eligible for an immediate theft loss tax deduction of 95% of your losses, or 75% of your losses if you pursue third-party recovery. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) created a safe harbor for statements that are forward-looking and accompanied by meaningful cautionary language. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:40 am
     The dissent asserted that the safe harbor provision of § 271(e)(1) exempted Cipla from being enjoined with Ivax; however, the majority disagreed with that conclusion, saying: "Cipla is providing information, and will provide material, that Ivax will use to obtain FDA approval. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:40 am
     The dissent asserted that the safe harbor provision of § 271(e)(1) exempted Cipla from being enjoined with Ivax; however, the majority disagreed with that conclusion, saying: "Cipla is providing information, and will provide material, that Ivax will use to obtain FDA approval. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 1:24 pm by Zak Gowen
 The withdrawal of this safe harbor, particularly with respect to employee compensation, will allow the Department to redouble its efforts in this area and should prompt caution on the part of clients who rely on such information in their businesses. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm by Eric
Most importantly, this opinion exposes a structural deficiency of the 512(c) safe harbor. [read post]