Search for: "Safeguard Properties, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 8:08 am by Rob Robinson
About Patented.ai Patented.ai is a pioneering intellectual property engine on the frontlines of safeguarding and revolutionizing the way we protect IP. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:00 am
Intellectual property lawyers say the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision yesterday in Masterpiece Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Plaintiff Tempur Sealy International Inc. recently filed a lawsuit against Defendant Luxury Mattress & Furniture LLC, a suit highlighting the significance of safeguarding trademarks and brand integrity. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:34 pm by Michael Viola
Filed under: After case is completed, divorce, During representation, equitable distribution, procedure, Property Division Tagged: Accelerated Maturity Rider, attorney fees, division of property, divorce, divorce insurance, equitable distribution, insurance, marital assets, marital estate, Return of Premium Rider, SafeGuard Guaranty Corporation Operations Inc., SafeGuard Marketing Management Inc., Time magazine, Wedlock,… [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
Our commitment to excellence has also earned us recognition by Inc. 5000, ranking us at #2703 on their 2019 list. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:04 pm
Property owners and their insurance companies have filed property damage lawsuits against CAI. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:27 am by John Diekman
Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc., NY Slip Op 04456 (2d Dept. 2014) Here is the decision.Tomorrow's issue: Dismissal of conversion and contract claims. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:49 am by Zoe Tillman
The three defendants are CitiMortgage Inc., the bank that sold Azzam the property; Safeguard Properties Inc., the property management company that Azzam claims was working with the bank; and Rightway Development Inc., the demolition company that he believes knocked the house down. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:43 am by David J. Clark
In summary, the non-compete provision in the lease agreement was a nice try by Optical Partners, Inc. to safeguard its business, but in the end, there was no legally recognized legitimate business interest sufficient to support that covenant, rendering it effectively worthless. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:43 am by David Clark
In summary, the non-compete provision in the lease agreement was a nice try by Optical Partners, Inc. to safeguard its business, but in the end, there was no legally recognized legitimate business interest sufficient to support that covenant, rendering it effectively worthless. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:04 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
You might be aware that a dangerous condition exists on site, but you might mistakenly (and reasonably) think the landowner put some safeguards in place to protect against the danger. [read post]