Search for: "Saga Broadcasting, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 12:20 am
RadioInk reports: Aldav LLC has filed suit against Clear Channel, Cumulus, Citadel, CBS Radio, Entercom, Saga, Cox Radio, Univision, Regent, Gap, Radio One, and the Aloha Station Trust, claiming that, by replacing advertising and other content in their online streams, the broadcasters are infringing on a patent on which Aldav holds a license.US 6,577,716 (titled Internet radio system with selective replacement capability) has a first claim: A method for replacing a… [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:58 am by Ben
 And finally is this another troll saga? [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am by Ben
 And finally is this another troll saga? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by Harry Cole
Readers will recall the long-running Aereo saga, in which Aereo, an Internet-delivered programming service, initially claimed that it was exempt from copyright obligations to the broadcasters whose programming it retransmitted. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm by Ken White
Padrick, an expert on distressed businesses at a financial services firm called Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, was well qualified for the job. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-27: Rogers, Te… http://t.co/4m5QNfwymo -> Time Warner Avoids Nexstar’s Broadcasting Retransmission Injunction http://t.co/J3HAD9kB2T -> Choice of Law for Online Copyright Infringement http://t.co/DTqpgNYMl3 -> Facebook responds to Eminem song publisher’s claim it violated copyright laws; view court details http://t.co/dGrxZhbE55 -> Fox & James Cameron Slapped… [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
The defendant is Chanel’s Salon LLC, a beauty salon located in Indiana and owned by someone called Chanel Jones. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
A key question before Mr Justice Carr in the latest episode of the Gleissner saga, Trump International Limited v DTTM Operations LLC [2019] EWHC 769 (Ch) (an appeal from the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO)), was whether the Hearing Officer was wrong to take into account evidence of Mr Gleissner's activities in unrelated actions in finding that Trump International Limited's application was made in bad faith.Trump International Limited (no connection… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
 The Brussels offering was a consultation on two things, the role of the publisher and the "panorama" right, and the IPOs a further consultation and technical review "on changes to Section 72 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (which permits the free public showing or playing of a film contained in a broadcast). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
* Disciplinary authority over the EPO Boards of Appeal: a former member speaksThe EPO saga has been extensively covered by Merpel, who gave the floor to the protests of almost the entirety of the internal members, and many (here and here) of the external members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal against the so-called "house ban" imposed on a member of the Board of Appeal, which were also backed by many European judges in a letter by… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
Telecinco is a Spanish broadcaster owned by the Italian Mediaset. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
i'm running for the board of SOCAN. if you are a SOCAN Music member, voting is really easy and i'd very much app… 2018-04-13 Right to be forgotten Delisting order made against Google in UK NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 https://t.co/GJqjywPdNQ 2018-04-13 Default judgement in copyright claim granted Odyssey Television Network Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25 (Australia) The long running saga of Mr Trkulja’s case against Google for the takedown of allegedly defamatory content published via its search engine from December 2012 to March 2014 continues. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am by Eric Goldman
However, the court indicates that the broadcast went out over the airwaves (both radio and TV), and my view is that Section 230 doesn’t apply to those broadcasts. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
IPKat had a post “Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt’s favour)”. [read post]