Search for: "Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2014, 9:22 pm by Florian Mueller
s Motion for Forfeiture of Bonds and Opposition to Respondent Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.' [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:37 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On June 28, 2011, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (“STA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Accordingly, Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung electronics America, Inc, and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC shall not file a motion seeking this administrative relief. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted a joint motion filed on January 29, 2010, by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC’s (“Saxon”), and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”), and Palm, Inc. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 4:19 am
("Apple"), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively "Samsung"), HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm by Florian Mueller
Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC". [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 64 denying Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to amend its expert report and Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:07 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 40 granting-in-part Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:20 pm
 The order denied summary determination motions filed by Complainant Saxon Innovations, LLC (“Saxon”) and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”) in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Handheld Wireless Communications Devices (Inv. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
HTC Corporation, HTC America Inc., Exedea Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:49 am by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 56 granting Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC’s (collectively, “Samsung”) motion to strike Respondent Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 33 denying a motion brought by nonparties Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
,and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC (collectively,Samsung) by the United States District Court forthe Eastern District of Virginia in two consolidated patentinfringement actions. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), filed a Joint Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
("Apple") moves to voluntarily dismiss its cross-appeal, No. 2014-1368.Apple further moves to reform the official caption of the remaining appeal (No. 2014-1335) to reflect the dismissal of Apple's cross-appeal.Counsel for Apple has conferred with counsel for Samsung Electronics Corporation, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Samsung")… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
"The purpose of this definiteness requirement", noted the court, is "to ensure that the claims delineate the scope of the invention using language that adequately notifies the public of the patentee’s right to exclude" (Datamize LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:17 am by Eric Schweibenz
’s (“Apple”) motion to compel Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce licenses and other fabrication materials which are related to an accused product. [read post]