Search for: "Securitas Security Services USA, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 5:45 pm
In Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
In Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:05 am
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:32 am
DOJ, Apr. 2, 2024 "The Justice Department announced today that it has secured a settlement agreement with Securitas Security Services USA Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:04 am
Services USA, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:08 am
On Wednesday, May 7, a federal judge in Chicago gave final approval to a $1.275 million settlement resolving the class claims of security guards in Illinois that they were forced to work off the clock during their training and orientation for employment with Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:10 pm
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., the Court of Appeal (Sixth Appellate District) examined the following question:This case presents the question of whether a plaintiff who brings a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:08 am
Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
Background In Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:20 pm
In the case Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:29 am
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., 2009 WL 2750994 (Wis. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Securitas Security Services, USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-487) in U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:40 am
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., the court posed the question of “whether a plaintiff who brings a representative action under PAGA may seek penalties not only for the Labor Code violation that affected him or her, but also for different violations that affected other employees. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:04 am
In Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:59 pm
In the meantime, California employers should review their arbitration agreements in light of these recent developments, as well as the California Court of Appeals recent holding in Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:23 pm
A court clarified some aspects of split shift pay last year in the case Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:17 am
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., No. 15-10582 (7/18/2016). [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 7:43 pm
Securitas Security Servs. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:23 pm
A court clarified some aspects of split shift pay last year in the case Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
Armed with these two holdings, the court further laid the basis for invalidating the Uber arbitration agreements by citing Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
