Search for: "Seiko Epson Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Headquartered in Nagano, Japan, the Seiko Epson Corporation is a worldwide leader in the manufacture of computer printers, imaging equipment and other information technologies. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Headquartered in Nagano, Japan, the Seiko Epson Corporation is a worldwide leader in the manufacture of computer printers, imaging equipment and other information technologies. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:33 am
From a post by Michelle Blythe at Lexology on the Australian case Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd [2017] FCA1403. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:33 am
The original Epson cartridges vs Calidad’s “repurposed” cartridges The case involved Seiko Epson Corporation’s (Seiko) “EPSON” branded printer cartridges that embodied the invention in two Australian Patents (Seiko Patents). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 2:08 am
Facts of the case The respondent, Seiko Epson Corporation, sold printer cartridges for inkjet printers, known as ‘Epson’ cartridges. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 2:08 am
Facts of the case The respondent, Seiko Epson Corporation, sold printer cartridges for inkjet printers, known as ‘Epson’ cartridges. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
Specifically, Epson’s subsidiary Seiko Epson Corporation participated in a conspiracy to fix prices of TFT-LCD panels sold to Motorola for use in Motorola Razr mobile phones from the fall of 2005 to the middle of 2006. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 11:45 pm
Recently, I wrote about the decision of the High Court in Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41, with particular focus on the Court’s finding, by a 4-3 majority, that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 8:39 pm
Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1403 concerns the collection, refurbishment, and refilling of ink cartridges for Epson-branded printers outside Australian jurisdiction, and subsequent importation and sale of the refilled cartridges by Calidad. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:25 am
Epson sued Calidad for infringement of their Australian patents (AU 2009233643 and AU 2013219239) covering the cartridges (Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41). [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:29 pm
In a significant judgment, the High Court of Australia has changed an aspect of patent law in Australia, ruling by a 4-3 majority that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product: Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
On February 3, 2011, the Complainants in the underlying investigation, Epson Portland, Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, California, and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan (collectively “Epson”) filed a petition to modify the GEO to indicate that components of certain ink cartridges were covered by the orders. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Epson argued that it included a disclosure at the bottom of each site stating: “3LCD is a marketing organization created and run by Seiko Epson Corporation to promote 3LCD technology and educate consumers about its benefits. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:09 am
., Ltd. of China, and Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd. of Walnut, California (collectively, “Ninestar”), and a further petition filed on February 3, 2011, by the Complainants in the underlying investigation, Epson Portland, Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, California, and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan (collectively “Epson”). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
., Ltd. and Ninestar US’s (collectively, “Ninestar”) request for an advisory opinion; (B) Ninestar’s petition for modification of the GEO and the cease and desist order directed to Ninestar US (“CDO”); and (C) a petition by Complainants Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation (collectively, “Epson”) for modification of the GEO and CDO. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:07 am
According to IFI's analysis, 2006 was a banner year for corporate patents with 173,772 issued (an all-time USPTO record) and a significant 20.8 percent increase compared to 2005. [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:27 am
"Seiko Epson Corporation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Audio recordings of the arguments can be found from the links below. 2011-1120 Seiko Epson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:47 pm
His clients include Atmel, Fujitsu, Goldman Sachs, Seiko Epson Corp., Teijin Pharma, Toshiba and Zeon Corp. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:15 pm
., Ltd. of Korea Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan Shuttle Inc. of Taiwan Systemax Inc. of Port Washington, New York Additionally, Chief ALJ Charles E. [read post]
