Search for: "Shade v. State of California, et. al."
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 2:01 pm
Simon Property Group, L.P. et al. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Phoenix Trading, Inc., et. al. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
In South Korea, Google will likely be fined soon over its bad-faith compliance with a statute relating to in-app payments, but if South Korea had simultaneously capped the commission (as is now being contemplated in South Africa), the situation would be clearer.One of the most interesting antitrust investigations of Google was announced by Germany's Bundeskartellamt (Federal Cartel Office) last month and relates to the licensing terms for Google Maps.While it's been quiet lately about the… [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City and County of San Francisco (Forest City California Residential Development, Inc., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2019) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Had Google gotten their way, Viacom would have had to join forces with Premier League et al to file one appeal brief. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
Art. 13 of the Regulation applies in the case of the scission of the estate even if only a part of the estate is located in a Member State and the declaration at hand does not concern this part. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
