Search for: "Smith & Nephew PLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 am
One such was Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:19 am
The scheme basically created off-shore funds that were not subject to Greek taxes to pay bribes to public doctors to purchase Smith & Nephew products.Smith & Nephew PLC with Foreign Bribery [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:21 pm
Safety concerns about metal-on-metal hips are mounting once again, with Smith & Nephew announcing a recall of some of its metal hip components in recent days. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:46 am
FORT WORTH, Texas, June 11, 2012 – Orthopedic manufacturer Smith & Nephew PLC has issued a voluntary recall for its metal hip socket liner for the R3 Acetabular System, according to an update on its website. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm
The SEC announced a settlement with Smith & Nephew PLC to resolve SEC charges that the global medical device company violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when its subsidiaries bribed public doctors in Greece for more than a decade.... [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:12 pm
The validity of the German patent (EP 0620720 (DE 69224847)) is being challenged by Medela, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, and Smith & Nephew plc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:41 am
The following is excerpted from a June 23, 2011 post at citybizlist of Boston: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Endoscopy Division, a subsidiary of Smith & Nephew plc (NYSE: SNN) (London Stock Exchange: SN) announced today that the jury in United States District Court in Oregon found in Smith & Nephew's favor that Arthrex, Inc., (Naples, Fla.) was guilty of infringing U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on Monday a settlement with London-based medical device company Smith & Nephew PLC to resolve charges that the company violated the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when its US and German subsidiaries bribed public doctors in Greece. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Once again this is a factor which undermines Smith & Nephew's favoured interpretation of the claim. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:20 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Kettel & Ors v Bloomfold Ltd [2012] EWHC 1422 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Patents Court) Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc [2012] EWHC 1602 (Pat) (13 June 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
30 May 2007, 9:36 pm
., and Smith & Nephew PLC. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:21 am
The SEC filed a complaint and entered into a settlement agreement with the English parent company, Smith & Nephew PLC, who consented without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, to the entry of an order permanently enjoining it from future violations of the relevant provisions of the FCPA and securities laws. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
Following a remarkably swift turn-around, the Court of Appeal last Thursday handed down its judgment in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1260.Two patents were in issue: European Patent No. 0 777 504 (‘504) concerning “wound drainage equipment” and No. 0 853 950 (‘950), a divisional of ‘504, concerning “wound drainage canisters” designed to fit in said equipment. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:17 am
The company is a subsidiary of Smith & Nephew, plc, in the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
A related prior dispute between Convatec and Smith & Nephew involving nonsilverised versions of their respective products, Aquacel and Durafiber, and relating to a different patent, was reported by the IPKat here, and the appeal decision upholding the first instance judgement can be read on BAILII.But let us return to the current case Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Anor No 2 [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat) (12 December 2013). [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kuku, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2533 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1260 (18 November 2010) Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash [2010] EWCA Civ 1314 (19 November 2010) Tilson v Alstom Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1308 (19 November 2010) Ingram v Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 1313 (19 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) JIH v News… [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Convatec counterclaimed that Smith & Nephew’s Durafiber product would infringe the patent. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:29 am
., Johnson & Johnson, and Smith & Nephew plc and Smith & Nephew, Inc., id., at *1 n.2 – filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH | CJEU on disclosure of infringers’ bank data in Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg | Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM | Moral ambiguity of trade secrets | CJEU on limits of TM exclusive right in TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd | Non-traditional trade marks in Japan.Never… [read post]
