Search for: "Smith v. Department of Aging and Disability" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Monday's Fourth Circuit opinions from Judges Robert King, Marvin Quattlebaum, and Henry Floyd (Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Code 55-3700.61 (“The Department delegates its authority under Article IX of the Public Welfare Code (62 P.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
This is especially so when the Court recently held that the Property Clerk's failure to commence a forfeiture action within the 25 day period, after a timely demand is made, fatal; as held in the case of Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Smith, decided by the First Department in 2009; Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Seroda, also decided by First Department in 1987. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am by Richard Hunt
” The relevant regulations focus on communications services, and in Est. of Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am by Giles Peaker
The Appellant is aged 23 and has a learning disability. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 5988 North Little Rock, AR 72119 E-mail: info@care-link.org Web: http://www.care-link.org Division of Aging and Adult Services 7th and Main Streets P.O. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
Department of Children And Families ,(Fla.App. 4 Dist.)Government - Agency was not required to pay any fees for establishment of special needs pooled trust for developmentally disabled teenager.In a matter of first impression, the District Court of Appeal of Florida has held that the Department of Children and Families, as trustee of a master trust into which a developmentally disabled teenager's Social Security disability benefits were paid, was not… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
United States, 19-7862Issues: (1) Whether, because the age at which a capital defendant became intellectually disabled does not bear on his moral culpability, the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq.; the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. 2617 et seq.; and the South Dakota Human Relations Act (SDHRA), S.D. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]